We all know that brown rice is better for you than white rice, and whole
wheat bread comes out on top over white bread, but does this pattern extend
to sugar as well?
It is often said that brown sugar is a healthier option than white sugar.
But you can chalk that up to clever marketing or plain and simple illusion.
In reality, brown sugar is most often ordinary table sugar that is turned
brown by the reintroduction of molasses. Normally, molasses is separated and
removed when sugar is created from sugarcane plants.
In some cases, brown sugar - particularly when it is referred to as "raw
sugar" - is merely sugar that has not been fully refined. But more often
than not, manufacturers prefer to reintroduce molasses to fine white sugar -
creating a mixture with about 5 percent to 10 percent molasses - because it
allows them to better control the color and size of the crystals in the
final product.
So the two varieties of sugar are similar nutritionally. According to the
USDA, brown sugar contains about 17 kilocalories per teaspoon, compared with
16 kilocalories per teaspoon for white sugar.
Because of its molasses content, brown sugar does contain certain minerals,
most notably calcium, potassium, iron and magnesium (white sugar contains
none of these). But since these minerals are present in only minuscule
amounts, there is no real health benefit to using brown sugar. The real
differences between the two are taste and the effects on baked goods.
Nutritionally, brown sugar and white sugar are not much different. [NYT]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment